# ENS Working Group -- Questions (v2) # Summary Create four foundational working groups and establish rules related to the creation, management, and dissolution of working groups within the ENS DAO. ## Abstract The work-related activities of the ENS DAO will take place within working groups. Each working group will have a specific focus area and mission, aligned with the constitution and needs of the DAO. This proposal establishes four foundational working groups: 1. Meta-Governance: providing governance oversight and support of the management and operation of the ENS DAO and working groups; 2. ENS Ecosystem: continuing development and improvement of the ENS protocol and ecosystem, with a focus on all technical matters related to ENS; (<span style="color:blue">The current functioning of the Ecosystem Working Group does not reflect this</span>) 3. Community: supporting the people and organizations that are users of ENS, with a focus on non-technical matters; and 4. Public Goods: amplifying ENS as a public good (<span style="color:blue">This wording is very vague and doesn't help the reader form any meaningful perspective</span>) and funding public goods within the ENS ecosystem (<span style="color:blue">The usage of word 'ecosystem' is confusing since it appears to elude to ENS Ecosystem WG; perhaps the Ecosystem WG is better called Technology WG?</span>), and more broadly within web3 (<span style="color:blue">Some examples or more description will be useful; the language is too vague to be meaningful</span>). This proposal also sets out rules related to the creation and dissolution of working groups and outlines how working groups will be managed within the DAO. ## Motivation Establishing working groups to manage DAO-related work will allow decisions to be made, and action to be taken, without the need for every initiative or decision of the DAO to be passed as a proposal. (<span style="color:blue">The decision-making process (who, how, why, where, when) of the WGs should be transparent and clearly outlined somwhere in the Governance Docs.</span>) The creation of working groups will streamline the management of the DAO into core areas that will persist, irrespective of changes in activities or contributors. A working group system will promote stability and encourage long-term thinking and planning (<span style="color:blue">There doesn't seem to exist an off-boarding process for stewards without which the said streamlining cannot happen since there cannot be continuity without proper off-boarding and transitioning</span>). The working group structure will provide new and existing community members clear onboarding pathways for meaningful participation and engagement in the DAO. ## Specification Create four foundational working groups and establish rules related to the creation, management, and dissolution of working groups within the ENS DAO (‘DAO’). 1. Working Groups 1. Four foundational working groups will be established within the DAO: 1. Meta-Governance Working Group; 2. ENS Ecosystem Working Group; 3. Community Working Group; and 4. Public Goods Working Group. 2. Formation of Working Groups 1. To create a new working group, a social proposal, as defined by the ENS governance documentation (‘Social Proposal’), must be put forward and passed by the DAO. 2. A Social Proposal to create a new working group must demonstrate that the new working group is needed and the work cannot be undertaken within an existing working group. 3. Dissolution of Working Groups 1. A working group can be dissolved by passing a Social Proposal requesting the dissolution of a working group or working groups. 2. If an active proposal is put forward to dissolve a working group, all working group funds, including outgoing payments, within that working group, are to be frozen with immediate effect, pending the outcome of the vote. (<span style="color:blue">Could the WG Multisig be frozen by the DAO?</span>) 3. Upon the dissolution of a working group, any and all unspent working group funds from that working group, at the time of dissolution, must be immediately returned to the DAO treasury, without delay (<span style="color:blue">So far the WGs have not paid to the contributors actively or in advance, which puts the immediate freezing of assets claim a little bit unrealistic</span>). 4. Working Group Stewards 1. Each working group shall be managed by five stewards (hereafter a ‘Steward’ or ‘Stewards’). 2. Stewards will be elected, unless otherwise stated in these rules, to serve within working groups for a set period of time (hereafter known as a ‘Term’ or ‘Terms’). 3. There are two Terms each calendar year: (<span style="color:blue">Six months appear to be too short of a time span considering the Stewards spend one month drawing up the plans alone. Consider increasing this to one year to allow for continuity.</span>) 1. The first Term commences at 9am UTC on January 1 each year and ends immediately prior to the commencement of the second Term (‘First Term’); and 2. The second Term commences at 9am UTC on July 1 each year and ends immediately prior to the commencement of the First Term of the following year (‘Second Term’). (<span style="color:blue">9 am is very random. 12 midnight is standard pressumption with UTC specification</span>). 4. Stewards are responsible for managing the operations of each working group. 5. The responsibilities of Stewards include, but are not limited to: 1. Managing operational tasks related to the administration of a working group; 2. Maintaining a description that sets forth the focus and intent of the working group (<span style="color:blue">Instead of using the term 'description', 'working principle' or 'theme' or 'agenda' is a better word, since the description is already outlined in the beginning of this document</span>); 3. Developing working group goals for the Term and providing a clear road map for achieving those goals, to be published in the ENS governance forum within the first 30 days of a Term (<span style="color:blue">This hasn't happened so far for all or most of the WGs; is there a plan B? Failure to set out a roadmap or some commitment to deliverables should be grounds for suspension?</span>); 4. Approving the creation and dissolution of sub-groups or workstreams within a working group to undertake work and/or carry out specific projects or tasks (<span style="color:blue">Do subWGs exist for a term or longer? Logic says longer since subWGs are not elected and are intended to persist</span>); 5. Requesting working group funds from the DAO; and 6. Approving and making funding available to sub-groups, workstreams, or contributors within a working group. 6. To request working group funds, Stewards of all working groups will collaborate to submit an active executable proposal, as defined by the ENS governance documentation ('Collective Proposal'), to the DAO within the final 15 days (inclusive) of the months of January, March, July, and October each calendar year (each a ‘Funding Window’). (<span style="color:blue">This definitely didn't work out in Q1/Q2. Requesting funding twice seems like a waste of time for everyone involved</span>) 1. In order for a working group to have a funding request included in a Collective Proposal submitted to the DAO during a Funding Window, the funding request must have passed as a Social Proposal in the same Funding Window. 2. In the case of an emergency, where working group funds are needed by a working group outside of a Funding Window, an Executable Proposal may be submitted at any time by a Steward of a working group to request funds from the DAO. 5. Steward Eligibility and Nominations 1. Any individual is eligible to nominate themselves to be a Steward of a working group within the DAO (‘Eligible Person’ or ‘Eligible Persons’). 2. To be eligible to be included in the ballot for First Term elections of a given year, Eligible Persons must nominate themselves between 9am UTC on December 6 and 9am UTC on December 9 (‘First Term Nomination Window’) (<span style="color:blue">The nomination window is too short. Give people more time to do their due diligence.</span>). 3. To be eligible to be included in the ballot for Second Term elections of a given year, Eligible Persons must nominate themselves between 9am UTC on June 6 and 9am UTC on June 9 (‘Second Term Nomination Window’). 4. An Eligible Person may nominate themselves to become a Steward of a working group or working groups during the First Term Nomination Window or the Second Term Nomination Window (each a ‘Nomination Window’), by meeting the requirements set out in a call for nominations posted in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum. 5. An Eligible Person who completes the steps outlined in rule 5.4 above during a Nomination Window and receives 10,000 signed votes to support their nomination will be included in the ballot as a nominee in the election for Stewards that takes place following that Nomination Window (‘Nominee’) 6. Steward Elections 1. Elections for working group Stewards for the First Term of a given year will take place by a ranked-choice vote of governance token holders using signed messages and will be open for 120 hours, commencing at 9am UTC on December 10 each year (‘First Term Election Window’). 2. Elections for working group Stewards for the Second Term of a given year will take place by a ranked-choice vote of governance token holders using signed messages and will be open for 120 hours, commencing at 9am UTC on June 10 each year (‘Second Term Election Window’). 3. The top-ranked Nominees from each working group vote held during a First Term Election Window or a Second Term Election Window (each an 'Election Window'), will fill any available positions for the role of Steward for those working groups for the Term immediately following an Election Window, based on the order in which they are ranked in each working group vote (<span style="color:blue">Relevance of ordering here seems unclear and a little bit of an overreach</span>). 4. A Nominee elected to serve as a Steward may not take up the role of Steward for more than two working groups during a single Term. 7. Delay of Nominations or Elections 1. In the event that nominations or elections for Stewards take place after a Nomination Window or after an Election Window, the nomination process or elections shall take place, as otherwise prescribed in rules 5 and 6 above, as soon as is practicable after the missed Nomination Window or missed Election Window. 2. In the event that an election takes place outside of an Election Window and after the commencement date of a new Term, outgoing Stewards from the previous Term shall stay in their positions as working group Stewards until immediately prior to 9am UTC the day following the end of the election, which, for the avoidance of doubt, is 120 hours after voting in those elections commenced. (<span style="color:blue">ENS DAO needs an autonomous and independent Election Commission to govern the election process. This cannot happen from within for obvious reasons. Conflict of interest, e.g. voting for one's own appointment, should be forbidden, among other things. This is also a good time to appoint a watchdog.</span>) 3. In the event that an election takes place outside of an Election Window and after the commencement date of a new Term, newly elected Stewards will assume the responsibilities of stewardship within working groups at 9am UTC the day following the end of the election, as defined in rule 7.2 above, for the remainder of that Term. 8. Core Team Stewards 1. For the First Term, commencing January 1 2022 at 9am UTC, each working group will include two Stewards who are core team members of True Names Limited (Singapore) (‘TNL’), as selected by TNL and not subject to the Steward nomination and election process outlined in rules 5 and 6 above. 2. For the Second Term, commencing July 1 2022 at 9am UTC, each working group will include one Steward who is a core team member of TNL, as selected by TNL and not subject to the Steward nomination and election process outlined in rules 5 and 6 above. 3. For the First Term of the following year, commencing January 1 2023, and for all Terms thereafter, all Stewards must be elected and appointed in accordance with the rules set out in rules 5 and 6 above. 9. Removal and Replacement of Stewards 1. Stewards may be removed at any time by: 1. a Social Proposal passed by the DAO; or 2. a simple indicative majority vote among the Stewards of a given working group, with the outcome of the vote communicated in the relevant working group category of the ENS governance forum. 2. Stewards may step down from their position at any time by communicating their intention to step down in the ENS governance forum. 3. In the event that a Steward is removed, steps down, or is unable to continue as a Steward, for whatever reason, prior to the end of a Term, any vacant positions will be filled for the remainder of a Term by the next highest ranked Nominee(s) in a given working group from the most recent working group vote in the most recent election for Stewards. 4. In the event that a Steward steps down or is removed prior to the end of a Term and is a member of the core team of TNL in accordance with rule 8.1 or 8.2 above, the vacant position(s) will be filled by a core team member or team members of TNL, as selected by TNL. 5. Any Steward selected by TNL in accordance with rule 8.1 or 8.2 above, can be removed by TNL at any time prior to the end of a Term, for any reason, and replaced by another core team member for the remainder of that Term. 6. Compensation for Stewards (<span style="color:blue">Accountability is missing here. When do stewards don't get compenstated? Stewards should be required a post at least a short monthly report of, say 200 words, and join at least one public call per month - there should be some accountability criteria set out.</span>) 1. Elected Stewards are eligible to receive fair compensation for their work as a Steward. 2. All requests for Steward compensation must be detailed in a Collective Proposal for working group funds submitted to the DAO in accordance with rule 4.6. 3. Stewards may not receive compensation for their role as a Steward outside of that compensation expressly provided for in a Collective Proposal submitted to the DAO in accordance with rule 10.2. 4. Stewards selected by TNL are not eligible to receive compensation from the DAO or working groups for their work as a Steward. 5. Amendments 1. These rules may be amended at any time by passing a Social Proposal.